Write one thing that you think you did well
I think I worked well with the stopmotion idea. However, I swiched from a 3D presentation to a film one so I had less time to work on my project.
Write one thing you think you need to work on for next time
I should stick to my original plan and not change it as soon as I find it hard because I had a lot of trouble catching up.
How did I improve?
I improved on essay writing. Mostly I improved on organization and how I structured it.
What can I currently do?
To currently improve I think I can spread out my time more efficiently, and make sure my project is evenly spread apart.
What are my next steps?
I can practice more on my essay more and make sure my time is more spread apart.
Write a brief summary of what steps you went through to get to essay.
I wrote down the main ideas and I branched out from there. I also included facts from my research to make a CER.
One thing I did well in my essay.
I did well on my organization and main ideas.
One thing I still need to learn to do.
I still have to work on my grammer and time management.
Me as a collaborator I would grade myself a meeting. I personally think I don’t drag us down negatively, and I don’t think I boost my teammates so hard they start really working hard . I will often pitch in some ideas , collaborate, often help to solve problems, but I not the person that solves everything, they express every idea etc. I mostly see myself as a collaborator when we have new seats or when we have new partners for projects. I do not often voluntarily go and sit with someone but if I do I collaborate well and there is no problems between them. So overall I work good with teammates and I effectively collaborate with them on a project.
In this unit we learned about percentages and how to use the percentages in a real life scenario. The thing I’m most proud of is figuring the percent at the end knowing the answer is a 100% right. I love when I see a problem solving in front of my eyes like a puzzle. The one thing I struggled with the most was finding what to divide by what. In other words I was having trouble figuring out what was the old number and what was the new number. But other than that I am really proud of how I spent my unit just not because I did well on a test just because when doing this summary sheet I could see how much I learned in this one unit.
How do you think your summative compared to your formative?
My CERER was a bit challenging because of the reasoning. In my formative I struggled with it a lot however, recently in the summative I was able to use the reasoning and got a 2.5 which I was not proud of but it was better and I understood it more.
Pitch Presentation-We didn’t have a formative for this, but I think that I did wonderful on the presentation since I memorized everything and came up with a hook different from everyone else
The out line was not a formative it was a preparation but it was a hard process to narrow down my thoughts and just do one story.
What are you proud of and what were some challenges?
For the CERER I am most proud of my reasoning because I used the resources around me to help me get better and understand it more.
For the pitch presentation I am really proud of it because I spoke in a loud voice and was not jittery.
To set one goal for the future is I will continuously use the flint chatbot and it can help me improve my writing CERER!!!
What is the DECIDE model?
The DECIDE model is a six-step model for decision-making, for teens who seek healthcare.
How can it be helpful?
What did you learn about the effects of different substances?
I learned how alcohol is addicting and how nicotine can be addicted and why people who are once addicted is finding it hard to get back into their normal life.
What are you proud of?
I am proud of how I did the evidence.
What were some challenges for you?
My main challenges were in the reasoning section because the claim was complicated and I struggled with it.
If you could redo the assessment, what changes would you make?
If I could make changes I would change my evidence and reasoning because I had trouble with the reasoning on how to connect it to the evidence.
What will you do now and the summative to ensure you meet the standards?
I will practice more CERER at home and use the AI chat bot to help.
What advice would you give yourself moving forward?
Analyze the story more so you have more so you have more material to help you during the formative.
Something that I am proud of:
I am very happy and proud that I got a 3 on the recent L3 test. This grade meant a lot to me because I had to work hard to get it. I want to talk about the tough parts I went through and what I plan to do better next time.
Challenges I faced:
The biggest problem I ran into during the test was figuring out the main idea or “topic” for my CER (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning) answer. The reading material gave only small hints or subtle ideas. I had to read things over and over just to spot the main point. This showed me that I need to look closer at what I read.
How I can improve for the next formative:
If I got a second chance to do this paper, I would like to write much longer and make my answers more detailed. My first paper was good, but it was a bit short. Adding more details would help me explain everything better and give the full picture of the topic. I think adding more info would make my paper stronger.
My goals to maintain the good score
To make sure I keep getting good grades in class, I have a clear plan:
Advice I will give myself:
The main thing I need to remember is to just jump in and participate in class a lot. Paying attention and talking during lessons is the best way to really get what we are learning. If I understand the different topics well enough in class, I know I can write a really good CER every time.
Initially, my view was that wellness influencers on platforms like TikTok and YouTube were inherently reliable authorities. My trust was based on superficial metrics: a large follower count, a visibly healthy appearance, and an engaging, confident delivery. I operated under the assumption that any trending health hack or superfood was inherently true and applicable to everyone, failing to question the basis of its popularity. My sole benchmark for trustworthiness was whether the video was fun to watch.
That trust has been completely dismantled. I now firmly believe that the popularity of an online health claim is entirely separate from its credibility. This major re-evaluation was spurred by the exercise where we investigated a viral “miracle supplement,” which introduced me to the systematic rigor of the C.R.A.A.P. criteria (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose).
My new method of assessment is proactive and skeptical. Before accepting any advice, I perform a thorough check on the source’s Authority, verifying if the person is a licensed physician or a certified expert in the relevant field. Crucially, I analyze their Purpose, looking to see if their primary motivation is to sell a product rather than genuinely educate. Instead of relying on a single source, I actively seek to cross-validate the information on neutral, reliable websites such as the CDC or established medical centers.
The most shocking lesson was recognizing how a compelling, catchy lie often spreads with far greater speed and effectiveness than a detailed scientific truth. This insight has provided me with essential red flags. I immediately become suspicious when someone guarantees a super fast, effortless fix for a complex health issue. Furthermore, if the content generates pressure, making me feel that I must purchase an item to achieve wellness, I recognize the post is likely driven by financial incentive and not altruistic guidance. This learning experience has profoundly enhanced my skills, making me a much more discerning and critical consumer of all online content.
Feedback:
We received feedback as good hand gestures and good confidence. We also received feedback as we had a good pie chart and presentation.
For this topic, the thing that was the most easiest thing for me to understand was the COP. I found this easy because I understood it well and was able to use it in my work. To find the COP you have to divide y by x. K=y/x. What stood out for the unit was how easy the question was but the time and memory it took to remember the formula and work that was required to the question. I found explaining my work the hardest because I found it really hard to meet the criteria.
© 2026 Avery's Portfolio
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑